In this review, we’ll delve into two of the most comfortable Nike shoes spanning the years 2021 and 2022. I’m here to provide insights drawn from my own experience, shedding light on whether these sneakers maintain, exceed, or fall short of the comfort offered by their predecessors.
Our discussion will encompass various aspects including the design of their uppers, the composition of their midsoles and outsoles, considerations regarding sizing, pricing, and more. So, let’s dive in and explore the comfort levels and enhancements these shoes bring to the table.
Most Comfortable Nike Shoes
In the realm of comfort and style, my top selections for 2022 (and even 2021) are the Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit 1 and 2, as well as the Nike Pegasus 38. In fact, these two models stand out not just for the year but as some of the most comfortable sneakers I’ve experienced to date.
To provide some context for this review, I want to clarify that our focus will not be on running performance or athletic capabilities. Instead, we’ll be delving into the realm of lifestyle wear and comfort.
While I’ve taken these shoes for a short run, it’s important to note that my experience is not extensive enough to provide a comprehensive performance assessment. However, I’ve worn these shoes extensively for casual use, allowing me to gauge their comfort levels and highlight the differences between the current iterations and their predecessors.
In this review, I’ll begin by discussing the comfort of the ZoomX Invincible and Pegasus models. Following that, I’ll provide an in-depth analysis of both shoes, breaking down their features and benefits.
Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit 2
Introducing the Nike ZoomX Invincible 2, the successor to the highly acclaimed Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit. Despite its rather lengthy name, the extraordinary comfort of this shoe overshadows any naming concerns.
The initial iteration of this shoe garnered widespread acclaim for its exceptional comfort, earning it a spot on my list of the most comfortable sneakers for two consecutive years. Naturally, my anticipation was high for the release of its successor, and I eagerly looked forward to experiencing the enhancements it brings.
Interestingly, many individuals are not opting for this shoe as a running companion. Instead, they’re drawn to its appeal as a maximal cushioned option for everyday wear. The ZoomX Invincible 2 indeed embodies the attributes of a maximum cushioned sneaker.
Before we delve into the technical aspects of the Nike ZoomX Invincible 2, let’s begin by discussing its unparalleled comfort – a trait that truly sets it apart.
Is Nike ZoomX Invincible a very comfortable shoe?
In terms of comfort, the Nike ZoomX Invincible 2 is truly a marvel.
The acclaim surrounding the original Invincible Run Flyknit and its ranking at the pinnacle of my list, as well as that of many others, is wholly justified by the immense comfort this shoe offers.
The midsole is a standout feature, delivering an exceptional softness underfoot. While its aesthetic appeal might not be the most striking, the trade-off is entirely worthwhile due to the unparalleled comfort it provides.
ZoomX, without a doubt, ranks among the softest cushioning technologies, if not the softest, within Nike’s arsenal. The decision to craft an entire midsole from ZoomX, and at such an ample thickness, results in a sensation akin to walking on clouds. It’s an experience that defies belief.
In the past, I held Adidas Boost as the pinnacle of comfort, yet ZoomX surpasses it. The degree of plushness beneath your feet feels as if it’s doubled.
Once again, I reiterate, the Nike ZoomX Invincible 2 is genuinely and incredibly comfortable. It stands as a strong contender for the title of the most comfortable Nike shoe available.
Its comfort level doesn’t deviate significantly, if at all, from the original version of the shoe. If you’ve yet to experience either iteration of the Nike ZoomX Invincible, I urge you to give it a try.
This shoe embodies a level of comfort that’s beyond extraordinary, a true delight for enthusiasts of maximal cushioning.
Pros
- Plush ride
- Shoelaces are better than the last version
- Energy return is unparalleled
- Great heel lockdown & roomy toe box
- Transitions are smooth & seamless
- Versatility is great
Cons
- Upper is a bit warm
- A bit slippery on wet surfaces
- Expensive
Nike Pegasus 38
The Pegasus holds a special place in my heart as one of my preferred lines of running and lifestyle sneakers, although I’d like to clarify that this is not a performance-focused review.
Remarkably, Nike has adhered to the simple numeric theme for the Pegasus sneaker line since its inception in 1983, resisting the temptation to give it a more whimsical or unrelated name.
Is Nike Pegasus 38 a very comfortable shoe?
With the notable updates in cushioning across the Pegasus line, particularly seen in the Pegasus Turbo, Pegasus 37, and now the Pegasus 38, these shoes have truly elevated their comfort level, making them ideal for both casual wear and active pursuits.
In my collection, I have multiple pairs of Pegasus shoes—some reserved for daily activities and others designated for running. The Pegasus stands out as an exceptionally comfortable and stylish option that caters to a wide range of needs.
The midsole, a key area of transformation from the Pegasus 36, is what I believe contributes significantly to the shoe’s newfound comfort. This revamped midsole design is also the reason why I find this shoe incredibly comfortable for casual wear.
Similar to the Pegasus 37s, the midsole combines the plush React foam with the responsive Air Zoom unit in the forefoot, resulting in an exceptionally comfortable and supportive ride. This combination of the ultra-soft React cushioning and the energetic Air Zoom unit provides a delightful balance that promotes both comfort and responsiveness.
The midsole feels remarkably soft and cushioned underfoot, ensuring exceptional comfort. Its design makes the Pegasus a standout choice for those who spend extended periods standing throughout the day.
As a fervent admirer of Nike React technology, I particularly appreciate the presence of Epic Reacts and the inclusion of the Air Zoom unit in the forefoot, which imparts an extra spring to each step.
Lastly, the tongue’s enhanced design contributes to an overall improved comfort experience. Its increased plushness and better fit against the foot prevent any discomfort or friction during walking or running.
All in all, the Pegasus 38 not only retains the core elements that made its predecessors exceptional but also introduces updates that heighten its comfort and wearability to new heights.
Pros
- Comfy wide toe box & stable ride
- Fits wider than Peg 37
- Versatile
- Cushiony yet peppy toe-off
- Upper is padded & hugs your foot
- Durable
Cons
- Grippy but not ideal for off-road running
Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit 2
Price
The Invincible Run 2 is positioned at a premium price point of $180, which is in line with its elevated status as one of Nike’s high-end offerings. The pricing strategy aligns with the incorporation of premium technologies such as ZoomX cushioning and a Flyknit upper, both of which contribute to the shoe’s advanced comfort and performance features.
Considering the inclusion of these top-tier Nike technologies, the price tag of $180 is well-justified and falls within the expected range for a premium sneaker in their lineup. While the cost may be anticipated due to the sophisticated materials and technologies employed, it’s worth noting that for many consumers, this price point could be considered on the higher end.
Nike Invincible 1 vs Invincible 2
Upon initial inspection, the resemblance between this shoe and the original Invincible Run is striking.
The outline maintains the exact same contour, the midsole appears largely unaltered, and apart from the color scheme, discerning a distinction between this version and the original would be challenging.
Notwithstanding this, there have been some subtle modifications to the ZoomX Invincible Run 2.
Descending to the lower part of the sneaker, the standout feature emerges: the full-length, exceedingly thick, max cushion ZoomX midsole…
As aforementioned, this comprehensive ZoomX midsole delivers an incredibly plush and soft sensation.
Nevertheless, for certain individuals, the extent of this cushioning might border on excess, and a firmer ride could be more to your liking. If that’s the case, this might not be the shoe for you.
However, if you’re in search of an exceptionally cushioned shoe with substantial rebound, the ZoomX midsole offers an unparalleled experience.
That said, the midsole has undergone no changes since last year.
Its breadth remains unaltered, presumably for stability purposes. Nonetheless, this shoe isn’t exceptionally stable due to the substantial and yielding nature of the midsole, which can lead to minor shifts within the shoe.
If you held a preference for the previous iteration of this shoe, your affinity will likely extend to the Invincible Run Flyknit 2, given its nearly identical nature.
Upper is different
The eyelet configuration has undergone a change from the prior design where a single piece of fused overlay encircled the tongue. In the current iteration, the eyelets are individual segments of fused overlay that interlace through the lace eyelets. This alteration also introduces a novel style of lacing in this new version of the shoe.
The updated shoe now features conventional oval laces, departing from the previous flat laces. According to discussions on various Reddit message boards, it appears that individuals are content with this alteration. Personally, I didn’t encounter any issues with the flat laces in the original rendition of the shoe, but it’s evident that Nike has been responsive to the feedback of runners in implementing these changes.
Tongue & Gusset
Beneath the laces, there’s a mildly revamped tongue. While the changes aren’t particularly dramatic, there are some subtle differences to note.
The upper side of the tongue now features a knit material as opposed to the previous neoprene-like material. This alteration might not have a substantial impact since the upper part of the tongue doesn’t possess significant stretchability.
It’s reasonable to assume that these changes might not significantly alter the wearing experience of the shoe itself.
Nevertheless, one notable improvement I observed and appreciated is that the elastic or gusset that secures the tongue in place is slightly larger in size compared to the previous version, and it possesses a somewhat reduced level of stretchiness.
As a result, when you slide your foot into the Invincible 2, you experience a slightly snugger fit. This snugness isn’t excessive, but it does contribute to a more secure and comfortable feel on my foot, even surpassing the comfort level of the previous shoe version – a feat I hadn’t anticipated.
Padding
Just like in the initial version of this shoe, the excessive outer padding on the upper part of the ankle collar remains a notable feature, which puzzles many, myself included.
While the padding encircling the upper part of the ankle collar offers a certain degree of comfort, there continues to be an extravagant amount of padding on the exterior side of the ankle collar that your foot doesn’t even come into contact with.
However, unlike the original shoe iteration that employed a neoprene-like material to cover the ankle collar, the latest version employs a flyknit material instead.
Yet, similar to the situation with the outer part of the tongue, I’m inclined to believe that this alteration doesn’t have a substantial impact on the overall experience. Nevertheless, it might offer a more refined aesthetic aspect.
Heel Clip
One of the more prominent changes on the sneaker can be seen in this slightly expanded heel clip.
In the initial iteration of the Nike Invincible, the heel clip was notably compact and purported to offer a degree of heel support along with some modest heel lockdown. However, due to its diminutive size, its effectiveness was somewhat limited.
In the updated ZoomX Invincible 2, the heel clip has been extended upward by a small margin. This adjustment appears to provide a touch more stability for the heel, although the difference might not be strikingly pronounced, if that explanation makes sense.
It’s possible that I haven’t noticed a significant impact because my heel didn’t require extensive support. However, if your heel necessitates enhanced lockdown and stability, you might perceive this alteration as more advantageous than I did.
Sizing & Fit
The fit of the Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit 2 remains consistent with the original version of the shoe. Therefore, I’m pleased to confirm that the Invincible Run 2 adheres to true sizing and fits me perfectly.
In my experience, I seldom encounter sizing issues with Nike’s performance running sneakers, and this shoe upholds that trend.
One advantageous aspect of Nike is their 30-day return policy, which is particularly beneficial if you purchase the shoe directly from Nike. This policy allows you to wear and test the shoe, and if it doesn’t meet your expectations, you can return it for a refund. This policy removes any obstacles to obtaining the right size of this shoe.
Seam
The Invincible 2 introduces an external seam that divides the flyknit into distinct halves with slightly varying knits. As a result, they exhibit distinct appearances.
To be candid, I initially felt a bit concerned about this seam. In many instances, seams on shoes, especially on flathead designs where the foot is in close proximity to the flyknit, can lead to rubbing issues.
However, in this instance, the seam is positioned precisely where the padding initiates, reducing the likelihood of significant rubbing against the foot. Moreover, there’s an internal seam that serves a different purpose.
In any case, the presence of the seam hasn’t resulted in any noteworthy problems. Personally, I don’t find it bothersome, and it even contributes to the overall aesthetics of the shoe.
Outsole
The shoe incorporates a rubber outsole that adopts a rocker-shaped design. This particular geometry facilitates seamless transitions from one step to the next, enhancing the overall fluidity of movement.
Regarding traction, the pattern remains identical to that of the initial Nike Invincible model. The traction pattern serves its purpose adequately, delivering sufficient grip. While it may not be exceptionally remarkable, it certainly doesn’t qualify as inadequate either.
Wrap Up
In terms of overall comfort, the Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit 2 doesn’t present a noticeable upgrade over the original Invincible, at least in my experience.
While there are some refinements in this updated iteration that I find preferable, such as the slightly enhanced heel clip offering a bit more support, the general feel of the shoe isn’t remarkably different. Breathability also remains fairly consistent with the original design, which I would classify as not particularly breathable.
Considering the eventual release of the Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit 2, if you’re considering purchasing this shoe or a version thereof, my suggestion would lean towards opting for last year’s model. The new version might eventually see a price reduction, while the current version remains at its full price of $180.
If, however, you’ve extensively used the original model and are intrigued by the improvements in the Invincible Run Flyknit 2, it might be worth considering, especially if the budget allows. Alternatively, taking advantage of a discounted price for the older version could also be a sensible choice.
Nike Pegasus 38
Once again, I want to emphasize that this review is focused on the lifestyle wear aspect of the Pegasus sneakers.
I managed to snag a pair of the special edition Nike Pegasus 38, sporting a unique and intriguing mismatched upper design. Personally, I’m drawn to unconventional colorways, especially since I use these sneakers both for running and casual wear.
Now, the crucial question arises: Does the Pegasus 38 truly constitute a noteworthy enhancement over its predecessor, the Pegasus 37?
Nike Pegasus 38 vs Older Versions
One thing you might notice about the Pegasus 38 is how similar it looks to the Pegasus 37.
There are definitely some changes around the sneaker on the toe box, on the tongue, and on the heel, which in my opinion actually really helped the shoe out a lot.
Midsole
In my personal experience, I’m delighted to confirm that the midsole of the Pegasus 38 closely mirrors that of the Pegasus 37, maintaining its full-length React foam cushioning configuration.
Similar to the earlier Invincible model, there might be individuals who perceive the Pegasus’ midsole as overly cushioned, and I can definitely see where they’re coming from.
As someone who appreciates substantial cushioning, especially during runs, I find the comfort level of this shoe to be exceptional.
It’s worth noting that React foam, while not as soft as ZoomX, offers the advantage of better long-term durability since it retains its structure over time and doesn’t tend to compress like ZoomX does.
Upper
There are a couple of noticeable changes on the toe section of the sneaker compared to the Pegasus 37, with the material being one of them.
The textile mesh used on the Pegasus 38 has a notably soft and premium feel, reminiscent of the material used on the Pegasus 36. However, when comparing it to the Pegasus 37, the material on the Pegasus 38’s toe area seems slightly less premium and more basic in comparison.
Updated Last
A significant change has been made to the toe of the sneaker, as well as the overall fit of the shoe, addressing a common request from many runners. Nike has employed an entirely different last in the top of the sneaker, resulting in a considerably wider toe area. This modification ensures that your foot won’t feel cramped as it might have in older versions.
The wider toe area is certainly evident and even though I didn’t experience any issues with the fit of the Pegasus 37, trying on the Pegasus 38 with its broader toe space made me realize how accommodating and comfortable it can be.
Laces
Continuing upward on the shoe, you’ll come across the flat laces that elegantly weave through vibrant nylon loops.
One standout feature I truly appreciate about this shoe is the integration of these nylon loops into a midfoot webbing system. This innovation implies that when you cinch the laces, not only does it draw the upper part of the midfoot towards your foot, but it also engages the entire midfoot in securing your fit.
This mechanism bears a striking resemblance to Nike’s flywire technology and operates in a similar manner. In my experience, it significantly enhances the snugness of the fit. So, when I’m looking to achieve a truly secure and locked-down sensation, cinching the laces tight ensures that I distinctly sense the embrace around my midfoot.
Aesthetics
Aesthetically, I’m genuinely impressed with Nike’s approach to the Pegasus 38.
The addition of the synthetic leather eyestay is visually appealing, but what really sets it apart is the innovative attachment method to the rest of the sneaker. Nike employs an exposed contrasting stitch detail, a design element that evokes thoughts of high-profile sneakers like those from the Off-White collaboration.
While this style might not resonate with every runner’s preference, it undeniably introduces the sneaker to a fresh and contemporary aesthetic.
Beneath the laces lies yet another modification from the Pegasus 37 – the all-new Pegasus 38 tongue…
Tongue & Pull Tab
In the case of the Pegasus 38, the tongue has been transformed into an independent entity, a change that I find to be quite favorable. The construction of the tongue stands out as one of the most notable distinctions between the Pegasus 38 and its predecessor, the 37.
Furthermore, Nike’s decision to opt for a more conventional tongue design, in contrast to the less conventional version on the 37s, is a significant departure. This time around, the tongue boasts plush foam cushioning, enhancing overall comfort.
Interestingly, one of the details that I particularly appreciate, even though it may be considered less pivotal, is the all-new pull tab adorned with metallic Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 38 branding. The visual impact of this detail is quite captivating, especially when the sneaker catches sunlight during a run.
Inside & Heel
In the case of this specific colorway, the sockliner boasts a dark gray hue, contributing to its aesthetic appeal. Notably, the insole exhibits a mismatched color scheme, with green and orange on the right shoe and purple and pink on the left.
Upon closer inspection, it appears that Nike has also reengineered the heel segment of the shoe. They have introduced additional padding around the upper ankle region and enhanced the overall fit around the heel for a more secure sensation.
Having had the opportunity to run in this shoe a couple of times since obtaining it, I can confirm that there is indeed an evident improvement in heel lockdown with the Pegasus 38 compared to its predecessor, the 37s.
In summary, the heel counter’s enhanced plushness and security significantly differentiate the Pegasus 38 from its forerunner, the Nike Pegasus 37.
Outsole
Moving to the bottom of the shoe, you’ve got this rubber outsole that comes in blue and gray. The traction pattern is exactly the same as what you had on the Pegasus 37s.
One little thing I noticed about this outsole is that it has these speckles throughout the rubber and I’m wondering if that’s because they’re using some recycled materials.
Nike is really pushing recycled materials at the moment and so that could be what they’re doing, but it seems they didn’t call it out in their marketing materials.
Usually, when they do something like this where they use recycled materials, they make sure to call it out, but they didn’t and so it’s possible that they’re either not using any or they’re using very little.
Price
Speaking from the perspective of a casual runner who takes pleasure in both running and wearing running sneakers in everyday life, the Pegasus 38 checks all the right boxes for me, making it an ideal choice. What’s even more appealing is the astonishingly affordable price tag of just $120.
Considering the quality and features of this shoe, one might have expected Nike to set a higher price point, perhaps around $150 or $160. However, I’m pleasantly surprised that they’ve decided to maintain the $120 price point. This decision aligns well with the shoe’s remarkable value.
For those who are fortunate enough to come across discounted Pegasus 37s, especially at outlets like the Nike store, it’s worth considering whether the minor differences in tongue and toe box design between the 37s and 38s are significant factors for you. If these aspects don’t strongly influence your preference, the Pegasus 37 might be a wise choice, as it closely resembles the 38s in terms of comfort and performance.
Wrap up
To sum it up, the Nike Pegasus 38 stands as an exceptional choice for both everyday running and casual wear. For those familiar with the Pegasus 37, the Pegasus 38 delivers a familiar experience.
However, if you found the Pegasus 37’s underfoot feel and overall comfort not to your liking, the Pegasus 38 doesn’t bring significant changes in this regard.
That said, subtle improvements in the toe, tongue, and heel areas might tip the scales for some who had a lukewarm response to the Pegasus 37. These enhancements could potentially make the Pegasus 38 more appealing.
As for whether it’s worth upgrading from the Pegasus 37 to the 38, the decision isn’t crystal clear. If your Pegasus 37 pair is still in good shape, it might be wise to use them fully before considering the 38s. Waiting for the Pegasus 39 release and then snagging the 38s on a discount could be another savvy approach.